I am further bewildered and confused too, when NC members demurred at their own dissolution. NC being house of the review and advisory body to the government must depict unprecedented examples to the people of Bhutan. If NC has to accept the emolument hike when being pocketed by the government, what is the point of antagonizing during the proposal time? As a concern citizen I can sense a serious of motives and intentions behind the salary deferment through live telecast but replenishing the pocket behind the camera.
Our democracy was just
six years old and in our young democracy, if our elected members exhibit such
kind of drama to the eyes constituents, how can we expect our people to trust
our representatives and nature of the democracy. With the full of trust and
infinite expectations, people of Bhutan has ushered democracy in 2008 and we
have just pressed electronic voting machine only for twice.
I have failed to understand
the rationale behind accepting the salary hike after having rebuffed by the
same NC members. Does it mean that NC members tried to canvass our people by orally
deferring their salary only through live telecast? Should I consider upper house
of Bhutan as a house of the chameleon? However in future I will never anticipate
such initiatives from our Honorable National Council members.
I am sick of those bro. The goodness in our politicians are just like a cotton candy - very appealing at first but doesn't last even for few minutes. They're speaking as if some enlightened sages' tongues are inside their mouths. But when they are given a chance to act, they become heinous villain available in the country. I wonder the state of nation if mindsets of all our politicians are like that.
ReplyDeleteThat is the inner beauty of our politicians Sherub. By witnessing the nature of Bhutanese political beauty for past six years I have promised myself to refrain from casting vote in upcoming elections, be it LG or NC or NA.
ReplyDelete